Search   
Bluronline.com - We Know It!!
 Home | More Questions  | Question Library   | AddThis Social Bookmark Button |
Arts & Humanities
Beauty & Style
Business & Finance
Cars & Transportation
Computers & Internet
Consumer Electronics
Dining Out
Education & Reference
Entertainment & Music
Environment
Family & Relationships
Food & Drink
Games & Recreation
Health
Home & Garden
Local Businesses
News & Events
Pets
Politics & Government
Pregnancy & Parenting
Science & Mathematics
Social Science
Society & Culture
Sports
Travel

 
 
 
 

 
 

Sports



Seahawks gettin rid of alexander is that a good decision??

 

Sports

 

i say its impaired because they still gotta pay him because of his contract!

Answers :hell no its not acute to get rid of one of ur best players....stupidity

Answers :yea but if im not mistaken they active 2 active backs in chargeless bureau and aswell he just angry 30 which is if a lot of backs activate to abatement and he has had abrasion issues the endure brace of years

Answers :yes, it was a abundant decision....they still accept to pay him but they accept addition atom in the roster.....his numbers in the accomplished two year don't according his 2005 numbers....

Answers :it was a acceptable accommodation the seahawks got jones afterwards the cool basin appearence injurys chock-full him from assuming
at his acceptable level

Answers :They've absitively that the cap hit isn't as bad as accepting a above mvp who may accept absent a footfall accompany down the franchise, abnormally with their already awash (and adolescent backfield).

I anticipate its best they allotment ways.

Answers :blame the gm or something for the contract
but his time as a ascendant amateur is up and its justified to absolution him for active in the now
hes not wat he acclimated to be and the accomplished two seasons accumulated havent akin his stats from his one mvp season

Answers :he should of never been on the anger cover

Answers :he was gonna be cut ,no way they were gonna accumulate him ,not abiding how abundant they will accept to pay him ,nfl affairs are not affirmed so i don't apperceive why they would accept to pay him any added than what he got if he active which was 15.1 actor above that seattle is chargeless of his 62 actor contract.

Answers :I would rather see him go than be a accountability on Seattle's offense. They can't clean a active bold about a guy that has been accepting consistently injured, runs with no heart, and whose teeth are just way to abuse big. Now that Tiki Barber is gone Shaun has the better teeth in the NFL. Not the endure acumen is actual important, but I anticipate its kinda funny.
Ok, i can ride a board, but i can not do an ollie.
I no, im wierd, the easiest trick.
can you accord me some advice or a website what can help?
I apperceive what to do, i just cant.

What is your answer?

Seahawks gettin rid of alexander is that a good decision??



Social Bookmark



RSS Feeds

addthis

Subscribe



Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Add to Technorati Favorites


Previous: Anyone see an Angel when you were a child?
|
Next: What's cooler than being cool? 



     
Copyright  © 2008 Bluronline.com reserved.    My Zimbio   |       |       |